These findings would suggest that dual kidney-liver transplantation has an uncertain role as a strategy to expand the existing kidney donor pool in combined transplantation. GitHub - hans/obsidian-citation-plugin: Obsidian plugin which integrates your academic reference manager with the Obsidian editor. Search your references from within Obsidian and automatically create and reference literature notes for papers and books. Contrary to dual-kidney transplantation data in kidney-alone recipients, DKLT recipients in our study had inferior survival when compared with SKLT recipients of “higher-risk” donor kidneys. Obsidian plugin which integrates your academic reference manager with the Obsidian editor. Death was the most common cause of graft loss in all groups. Despite having overall similar donor and recipient characteristics compared with both “higher-risk” donor groups, recipient survival in the DKLT group at 36 months was markedly inferior at 40.9% (compared with 67.5% for ECD SKLT recipients and 64.5% for high-KDPI SKLT recipients) nondeath-censored graft survival did not differ. datasets, clinical trials, patents and policy documents.
We compared donor/recipient characteristics as well as graft/recipient survival between DKLT recipients and SKLT recipients of “higher-risk” kidneys (ECD and high kidney donor profile index donors). For example, review the funders or grants behind a publication, or identify where published. To investigate the feasibility of a similar approach with combined kidney-liver transplantation, we identified 22 dual-kidney liver transplantations (DKLTs) and 3044 single-kidney liver transplantations (SKLTs) performed in the United States between 20 using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry data. In kidney-alone recipients, dual-kidney transplantation using “higher-risk” donor organs has shown outcomes comparable to those of single-kidney transplantation using extended criteria donor (ECD) organs.
0 kommentar(er)
